Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Why I use word westerns in this?

I use word westerns to point those people in society who think they can do any thing in the name of freedom of speech. They can write any thing on Wikipedia if they find on internet. That is called original research and Wikipedia is also against original research. Because during discussions when I ask Wikipedia editors what they know about Islam? There answer was just through media nothing more then that. So it’s a open question are such people are eligible to write such important article about Islam.

8 comments:

haley said...

As a christian am I offended constantly by things I see on the internet. You know what I do? I don't go back to those websites anymore. It's not rocket science, but then again if you just did not return to wikipedia then you couldn't create controversy which is all you intend to do.

islaminhistory said...

salaam
you should also request in your petition for petitioners to contact their internet providers and ask them to block wikipedia as it displaying offensive articles against islam

Turkey,Syria, Egypt, Iran, Kuwait,Saudi,Jordan, Oman, Yemen, Malaysia, Indonesia,pakistan

Many of their internet providers already block offensive material so i am sure they would be happy to block wikipedia.

Lets see what wikipedia does then

Anonymous said...

"Turkey,Syria, Egypt, Iran, Kuwait,Saudi,Jordan, Oman, Yemen, Malaysia, Indonesia,pakistan

Many of their internet providers already block offensive material so i am sure they would be happy to block wikipedia."
Thats called censorship!

As haley allready pointed out the petition is unnecessary.

hypernation said...

to Islaminhistory - Wikipedia wouldn't do ANYTHING then, except carry on providing free uncensored information happily to enlightened countries who don't think information blackout is a very good idea. And the middle east would have no more access to a free unbiased resource. Good work, you fascist. Back to the dark ages. Read your history books before commenting on an important issue again.

Muslim Unity said...

@ haley
u don't go there. but what about ur kids and who are growing in this society. they will get used to this and one day people start treating Islam as they treat Christianity unfortunately. so we need to stop them. if they don't belief in religion its there problem not ours.

Muslim Unity said...

@ hypernation
i agree with ur point we can't keep our eyes closed. we has to tell them to respect religions. and hire some professionals to do such sensitive jobs. who can take responsibility what they write.

Cindy said...

Haley,

You should learn something about Islam before you make your comments. The religion prohibits pictures of Muhammad, peace be upon him. There are none. Therefore, no one knows what he looks like. Muslims find his depiction to be offensive and I don't understand what the harm is in removing an image from Wikipedia of something that is not an actual depiction anyway. Please open your mind to what is respectful of others. Having said all of that, I don't go to sites that I find offensive. I don't generally go to Wikipedia because I know that the information may not be correct and I certainly won't go to the link provided for this as I don't want to give it additional hits.

faty said...

No one can write soemthing verry effensive about a religion and then say freedom speech it's not allowed and no one wil accept such a thing so if they don't now when freedom stops so they can learn it by reading about our religion not attacking it everything has a limit and now enough is enough ....